APPROACHES
IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE
The importance of pharmacovigilance
the ongoing assessment of the safety of a marketed medicine has been
increasingly appreciated in recent years, owing in part to high-profile safety
issues with widely used drugs. In response, strategies to improve the
collection, integration and analysis of data related to post-marketing drug
safety are being initiated or enhanced. The key tools that are available for
pharmacovigilance are appropriate to use in different situations and consider
the future directions of the field.
Study designs used in
pharmacovigilance
Case
reports and case series: Case reports are concerned with single
patients who have been exposed to a drug and experienced an adverse reaction.
Case series can refer to a collection of patients who have been exposed to the
same drug and whose clinical outcomes are then evaluated and described.
Alternatively, a case series can be a collection of patients with a single outcome,
whose history is then checked to ascertain previous drug exposure.
Case-control
studies: Case-control
studies are retrospective studies where a group of patients with a particular
disease (or ADR) are compared with a group of patients who do not have the
disease, and their histories of previous exposure to a "risk factor"
are compared. They can be used to study multiple drug exposures, uncommon
diseases. They are relatively easy, fast and cheap in terms of data collection.
However, case control studies also have their weaknesses i.e. Finding
appropriate matched controls may be difficult.
Cohort
studies: Cohort studies compare a group of individuals with a drug
exposure to a group without the same exposure in terms of adverse outcomes. The
study can be either prospective or retrospective. They allow calculation of
incidence rates and precise risks and can be used to study multiple outcomes
providing unbiased drug exposure data with selection bias less than in
case-control studies. Their weaknesses are that they are relatively more
expensive, especially the ad hoc studies.
Meta-analyses:
In this era of evidence-based medicine, meta-analyses allow investigators to
review clinical trial data systematically. Although most investigators are
interested in the efficacy of treatments, it is also possible to investigate
adverse outcomes systematically. A systematic review of randomized controlled
trials involving administration of human albumin in critically ill patients has
been undertaken.
Until recently,
pharmacovigilance was mainly based on spontaneous reports, which provide low
evidence of risks associated with medicines. Today, the importance of the full
spectrum of the evidence hierarchy is recognized. This article reviews new
approaches and data sources used in pharmacovigilance and shows that individual
case safety reports, observational data, clinical trials and meta-analyses have
unique characteristics that complement each other for the overall benefit–risk
evaluation of medicines
In the past two decades,
pharmacovigilance scientists have increasingly adopted the fundamentals of
epidemiological research and applied them to the study of drugs. These
techniques give us better understanding of the beneficial and adverse outcomes
of medicines use. No doubt they will continue to play important roles in
pharmacovigilance.
For more details join us
@ https://drug-chemistry.pharmaceuticalconferences.com/
Comments
Post a Comment